Comments on: Luminar vs Lightroom for Photo Editing (7 Key Differences) https://shotkit.com/luminar-vs-lightroom/ The World's Best Photographers & their Camera Gear Fri, 10 Mar 2023 02:15:35 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.3 By: Dave https://shotkit.com/luminar-vs-lightroom/#comment-174930 Thu, 09 Mar 2023 00:22:45 +0000 https://ausrust.johnnyvps.com/?p=56688#comment-174930 I was an early Luminar adopter primarily because Lightroom’s pricing structure became excessive. I am a casual hobbyist and paying $10 a month for LR during months that it’s not used is not something I would do. Luminar Neo fit the bill. It’s easy to use, quickly gives good results and is ideal for the casual user. Adobe shot themselves in the foot. I would have been a LR lifer if they hadn’t become greedy.

]]>
By: Nilesh https://shotkit.com/luminar-vs-lightroom/#comment-167222 Fri, 17 Jun 2022 04:52:53 +0000 https://ausrust.johnnyvps.com/?p=56688#comment-167222 In reply to Peter OConnell.

Here the discussion is about a photo editing software and you are going into the semantics of language. In common parlance, steep learning curve means tough to master. that’s it.

]]>
By: Ron xuere https://shotkit.com/luminar-vs-lightroom/#comment-163055 Mon, 20 Sep 2021 14:46:57 +0000 https://ausrust.johnnyvps.com/?p=56688#comment-163055 I have LR6 if I go to Luminar will my catalog go across also as I don’t want to sort out 6,000+ shots again. Not worried if I have to convert all photos to JPEG first. Thanks for your help.

]]>
By: doug g https://shotkit.com/luminar-vs-lightroom/#comment-156839 Thu, 17 Dec 2020 14:53:08 +0000 https://ausrust.johnnyvps.com/?p=56688#comment-156839 We get it, it takes time to learn, now go out and take some photos!

]]>
By: Matthew Lacy https://shotkit.com/luminar-vs-lightroom/#comment-156704 Tue, 15 Dec 2020 02:54:25 +0000 https://ausrust.johnnyvps.com/?p=56688#comment-156704 In reply to Banks Peete.

Or it could be time on the y-axis and learning on the y-axis. As more time goes on, (higher y-values), the learning hasn’t increased as quickly, so the x-values don’t change as much. Going back to the slope formula, that makes a larger delta-y value than delta-x value, or a steep slope.

]]>
By: Mark Condon https://shotkit.com/luminar-vs-lightroom/#comment-156489 Wed, 09 Dec 2020 18:55:15 +0000 https://ausrust.johnnyvps.com/?p=56688#comment-156489 In reply to Steve Flowers.

That does sound odd, Steve. Unless you’re using a 100+ megapixel camera and building 1:1 previews on a slow computer, 60 images should import into Lr in less than 5 minutes for sure.

]]>
By: Steve Flowers https://shotkit.com/luminar-vs-lightroom/#comment-156473 Wed, 09 Dec 2020 02:27:59 +0000 https://ausrust.johnnyvps.com/?p=56688#comment-156473 I use Lightroom for cataloging and Luminar for some of the AI features and sky replacement. I also love the Orton effect (yes, there are ways to simulate that in LR but it’s just so easy with Luminar). My issue is speed. LR is painfully slow to import files, for some reason, and I haven’t quite figured out what the issue is. For example, last week I took about 60 photographs at the coast before the fog rolled in. To import 60 files, which were first copied to a SSD hard drive, took almost 20 minutes. And I wasn’t applying any presets – just importing. Luminar is lot faster in that regard. If they ever make their cataloging more robust, I’d switch to Luminar in a heartbeat.

]]>
By: Peter OConnell https://shotkit.com/luminar-vs-lightroom/#comment-144352 Sun, 15 Mar 2020 14:20:30 +0000 https://ausrust.johnnyvps.com/?p=56688#comment-144352 In reply to reza.

You’re both kind of correct. A steep learning curve means that in order to really be able to do any useful work with the software, it takes a lot of initial learning. Once it’s learned, you’re knowledge starts to plateau; you can slowly learn more tips and tricks, but overall you’ll understand it. In contrast if something has a shallow curve, you can get up and running immediately. You’ll very slowly uncover more knowledge about how to use it. It will take longer for your knowledge to increase to the level that allows the software to be as powerful as the software with a steep learning curve. So I think what the article is saying is that since LR has a steep learning curve, it will take new users quite a while before they can do even basic tasks with it.

]]>
By: reza https://shotkit.com/luminar-vs-lightroom/#comment-143618 Wed, 22 Jan 2020 03:03:52 +0000 https://ausrust.johnnyvps.com/?p=56688#comment-143618 In reply to Banks Peete.

well, in everyday usage a steep learning curve means that you will be having a long time learning stuff bc apparently people are thinking that you’re climbing a mountain so a steep one would be hard to climb. language is stupid i know.

]]>
By: Banks Peete https://shotkit.com/luminar-vs-lightroom/#comment-143336 Fri, 27 Dec 2019 23:43:29 +0000 https://ausrust.johnnyvps.com/?p=56688#comment-143336 You said that Lightroom Classic “has a pretty steep learning curve”. I think that you mean the opposite of what you saying. A steep learning curve actually, though counterintuitively, means that something does not take much time to learn. If time is on the x-axis and learning is on the y-axis, then a steep learning curve means that you are learning a lot in a little amount of time.

]]>